Robert G. Boatright
Associate Professor of Political Science, Clark University
Expertise & Civic Involvements
Boatright teaches courses on American political behavior, political parties, campaigns and elections, interest groups, political participation, and political theory; other current research interests include comparative campaign finance and the role of ideological appeals in campaigns. He has served as a research fellow at the Campaign Finance Institute, as an American Political Science Association Congressional Fellow, and as a research associate at the American Judicature Society. He has published books and articles on campaign finance reform, congressional redistricting, the congressional budget process, and on various aspects of jury service. Boatright is also the director of the Worcester Campaign Finance Project.
Every Picture Tells a Story: The 2010 Round of Congressional Redistricting in New England (edited with ) (Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise, 2014). Examines the act and effects of redistricting in the six New England states – known to be heavily Democratic – to provide a comparative examination of state politics and political institutions.
Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges (University of Michigan Press, 2013). Shows that primary challenges are not becoming more frequent; they wax and wane in accordance with partisan turnover in Congress. The recent rise of primarying corresponds to the rise of national fundraising bases and new types of partisan organizations supporting candidates around the country.
Interest Groups and Campaign Finance Reform in the United States and Canada (University of Michigan Press, 2011). Provides a comparative analysis highlighting the role of institutions in shaping group activity, the extraordinary role of interest groups in American electoral politics, and the inherent difficulty in regulating group activity without stifling debate.
"Who are the Spatial Voting Violators?" Electoral Studies 27, no. 1 (2008): 116-125. Uses the American National Election Studies’ seven-point ideological placements from 1972 through 2004 to distinguish between spatial voters and voters who are ideologically closer to one candidate yet vote for another candidate. For each of these cycles, between 9 and 15% of voters are spatial voting violators. These individuals demonstrate below-average levels of political knowledge, activism, and interest, yet considering the direction of the violation yields a mix of potential incentives for violations.
"Situating the New 527 Groups in Interest Group Theory" The Forum 5, no. 2 (2007). Seeks to reconcile the activities of several of the groups organized during the 2004 election cycle under section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code with existing theories of party and interest group behavior. While 527 groups have frequently been categorized as extensions of traditional advocacy groups or party networks, Boatright argues that existing theories do not account for the functional differentiation between these groups.
- "An Expert on Congressional Primaries Weighs in on Cantor’s Loss," Interview with John Sides, The Washington Post, June 12, 2014.
- "No, Primaries Aren’t Destroying Politics," Politico, February 18, 2014.
Talks and Briefings
- "The 2014 Midterm Election, One Year Out," Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, November 5, 2013.
- "Casualties of the Ground War: Personal Contacting in 2012 and Its Discontents," “The American Election 2012: Contexts and Consequences” Conference, St. Anselm College, Manchester, NH, 2013.
- "Interest Groups, Then and Now," Wesleyan Media Project Conference on the 2012 Election, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, 2012.